Tomorrow I will send my oldest son off to college.
I'm not alone. Thousands -- probably millions -- of parents are going through the same thing I'm going through. Millions before me have been there, done that.
I wonder today how they got through it. How do we take our son, whose been ours and only ours for the last 18+ years, five hours away from home, drop him off and leave him there? How do we handle knowing that he will never live under our roof again? He doesn't belong to us anymore.
The answer is simple, of course. I know that.
You just do.
He, like those millions of others, will be fine. He will make his own way in the world, and he will have a family, and a career, and he will come and visit us on holidays, and breaks, and maybe other times too.
We will watch him mature and grow and become a worthy adult, and he will do great things, and hopefully enjoy life as much as his Mom and I do. We will be happy for him, and happy because of him.
I know that.
So why does my heart hurt so bad right now?
Friday, August 23, 2013
Friday, March 29, 2013
Yesterday...
My oldest son will turn 18 years old tomorrow.
I'm not sure how that happened. It doesn't seem right. He can't possibly be that old.
You see, just yesterday, we brought him home from the hospital. His mom delivered him five weeks early. He had to stay there three days. He's fine now. He was all wrapped up in those little blankets the hospital is required by federal law to hand out. You know the one's I'm talking about. The white ones, with the pink and blue stripes on them. You brought your kids home in the same ones.
Yesterday, I changed his diaper for the first and only time. I know, I'm a big jerk. I had poop everywhere. On the ceiling, on the fan, on me. Not sure how that happened. Whoever said that changing a diaper is a bonding experience was out of their mind.
I bought him his first drum set for Christmas yesterday. It's just a toy kit, of course, but I think it was his favorite present. He's been playing them all morning.
Yesterday, we made a tape singing "Monkey Jumping on the Bed" to play for his little brother. His little brother is in the hospital. Has been now for several weeks. The little guy was born way too early, but big brother loves his little brother and can't wait for him to come home. He wanted to make a tape so his little brother could listen to it and maybe get better quicker. "Itsy Bitsy Spider" is on the tape as well.
Yesterday, we wrestled on the bed together. We like to wrestle on the bed. We do it all the time. The rule is, every time he knocks me out, he has to kiss me on the cheek to wake me up. He kisses me on the cheek a lot. He doesn't know it, but he never really knocks me out. I just like getting kisses on the cheek.
Just yesterday, he started Kindergarten. I didn't think his Mom was going to keep it together, but she did better than me. He doesn't know this, but I cried. I was OK -- really -- until he started crying as we left. That was about all I could take. Funny, but I seem to cry a lot more now that I have kids.
Yesterday, he was holding my hand and smiling from ear to ear. We'd just got off the church bus on a youth church trip and I'd been silly around all his friends on the bus. All his friends were laughing, and he really likes it when I'm silly. He likes thinking that his friends think I'm the cool Dad.
I coached his first baseball game yesterday. He loves to pitch. He's a natural. He could throw a ball from the day he could pick one up. He also plays 3rd base. That's where his favorite player, Aaron Boone, plays for the Reds. He loves the Reds. Wonder how that happened? Why, just yesterday, I was holding him in my arms in the yellow seats at Riverfront Stadium when Aaron Boone hit a walk-off home run to win the game. We bounced up and down together as the ball landed just a few rows from us.
In fact, yesterday, he got to meet Aaron at RedsFest. We go to the Reds fan festival every year. We stood in line to meet Aaron, and when we got to him, Aaron just scooped him up in his arms like he was his own, and Mom took their picture together. It's a great picture. But he has lots of pictures with Reds players.
You know what else was cool? Yesterday he went with his baseball team to the George Foster baseball camp, and got to work with the 1977 National League MVP himself. He and all his buddies got their picture with big George and got to play baseball with the man. Most boys his age don't know who George Foster is, but my son took pride in telling them all about him.
Yesterday, we played a song together at church. He actually helped me write it. It's a Christmas song, and I know he's not very old, but he really helped with the lyrics and had some solid suggestions about the song. We practiced it and sang it at church. Everybody seemed to really like it. His mom was proud. I think he might have the makings of a good musician.
I had a long day yesterday. I was the substitute teacher for his 6th grade class. A lot of his baseball buddies are in the class with him. I sorta abandoned the outline the teacher left for me, and instead, we played a game where I would quote a line from a movie, and they would have to guess the name of the movie. He says its the most fun he ever had a with a substitute teacher.
Yesterday was his 12th birthday, and he celebrated by pitching his traveling team to a victory in their first game of the year. Complete game. What a great time. I like being his coach very much, and I just had to give him the start, what with it being his birthday and all.
He started junior high school yesterday. Jr. High! Where does the time go? I thought he'd be a little upset with us moving him to a different school away from all his friends. But he loves it. Didn't bat an eye. He says he really likes it, and there's only two other boys in his whole class. He thinks that's kinda cool.
Yesterday we got back from Washington DC. His 7th grade class took a field trip there. And I was lucky enough to be one of the chaperons. We had a blast, him and me and his buddies. He says I was the coolest Dad on the trip. He still likes his friends thinking I'm cool.
We met his first girlfriend yesterday. She's a cutie.
And then, yesterday, we just got back from a vacation with his girlfriend's family. We all really enjoyed ourselves. The weather was great in Hilton Head. It was the first time we'd ever been there. In the pool one day, he was protecting his girl. I would pretend to try to get her, and he'd fight me off. Stayed between me and her the whole time. And she clung to him pretty close. We also took a boat ride to look for dolphins. It was pretty cute watching him and her together, giggling, just digging be kids at that moment, at that time. Got a great picture of the two of them laughing together on the boat. Pretty special.
I baptized him yesterday. I don't think I can tell you about it though. Not without crying.
My boy became a teenager yesterday. All he wanted for his 13th birthday was to go to the Reds Opening Day. So that's what we did. Unfortunately, the weather was kinda nasty yesterday, and even though they got the game in, the Reds lost 2-4. But he didn't care. He just liked being there, just me and him. We had a great time.
He's a good drummer, my boy. Yesterday, I had the pleasure of playing worship at church with him playing drums right beside me. He's worked his way up from just playing bongos and percussion on Wednesday nights. Now he's on the kit, in the big service on Sunday mornings. And he loves it. I love it too.
Yesterday, he started high school. I can't believe it. My boy's in high school. He's been playing ball with the school baseball team all summer, and he was really looking forward to getting started. He seems to really like it. In fact, yesterday, he came home from school and told me and his mom how he really looks forward to going to school everyday. Imagine, a teenage boy enjoying school.
Yesterday, the girl broke up with him. It's his first break up. I wonder how he'll take it. My heart hurts for them both.
I had a bad vertigo attack yesterday. I tried to make it all the way home, but I couldn't. So he drove me the rest of the way home. Even though he's only had his permit a couple of months, and he's only driven the big 15-passenger van a few times, and we were on the side of I-465, he hopped in the seat and drove me home like a pro. We even had to stop on the side of the road a couple of times for me to throw up. No worries. Like he's been doing it for years.
We took him yesterday to buy his first car. Are you kidding me? I think he got what a wanted. A pretty cool Durango. We got a good deal on it. And it's big enough he can carry his drums around. Maybe now, he'll get more excited about driving.
Yesterday, he started his first game of his Junior year at first base. He's the starter there this year. He's spent the last two years backing up the previous starter, and now its his turn. We're pretty excited about this year.
We took him to visit the college he wants to go to yesterday. Middle Tennessee State. It's the only place he's applied to. He wants to study Audio Engineering. That's pretty cool. Plus, there's a Red Lobster nearby, so he can get all the Cheddar Bay biscuits he wants.
Yesterday was the first day of his Senior year. Wasn't it just yesterday he started Kindergarten?
This isn't a story that's unique to us. Billions of parents since Old Testament times could tell this same story. Long before we got here, they could tell us what yesterday was all about. Some of you right now know what I'm talking about. You know what yesterday feels like. We have dear friends who've been robbed of some of their yesterdays, and so they have less of them to remember than I do, but they're no less special to them. Even more special, in some ways.
All that's left now are tomorrows. And I wonder what kind of yesterdays all those tomorrows will become. And I look forward very much to knowing what happened yesterday.
But I want to share one more.
Yesterday he was just seven years old. I was at the hospital all day with my wife. She has a brain tumor, and was in surgery all day. Literally, all day. I was tired -- physically, but mostly, emotionally. Friends and family had been by all day to check in on us. My ministers had been there to pray with me. Even the wife's Step-Dad's mom came by. She's so sweet.
But MeMe and Grandpa got him from school and took him to his baseball game. And then they brought him to the hospital to see us. His mom wasn't out of surgery yet. But he won his game and had a smile on his face. He was still wearing his baseball uniform.
So he crawled up on my lap, put his arms around my neck, and let me cry on his shoulder. He held me, and comforted me, mature way beyond his years, and told me it would all be OK. Turns out, he was right.
Yesterday, he was seven years old.
Tomorrow, he'll turn 18.
I'm not sure how that happened. It doesn't seem right. He can't possibly be that old.
You see, just yesterday, we brought him home from the hospital. His mom delivered him five weeks early. He had to stay there three days. He's fine now. He was all wrapped up in those little blankets the hospital is required by federal law to hand out. You know the one's I'm talking about. The white ones, with the pink and blue stripes on them. You brought your kids home in the same ones.
Yesterday, I changed his diaper for the first and only time. I know, I'm a big jerk. I had poop everywhere. On the ceiling, on the fan, on me. Not sure how that happened. Whoever said that changing a diaper is a bonding experience was out of their mind.
I bought him his first drum set for Christmas yesterday. It's just a toy kit, of course, but I think it was his favorite present. He's been playing them all morning.
Yesterday, we made a tape singing "Monkey Jumping on the Bed" to play for his little brother. His little brother is in the hospital. Has been now for several weeks. The little guy was born way too early, but big brother loves his little brother and can't wait for him to come home. He wanted to make a tape so his little brother could listen to it and maybe get better quicker. "Itsy Bitsy Spider" is on the tape as well.
Yesterday, we wrestled on the bed together. We like to wrestle on the bed. We do it all the time. The rule is, every time he knocks me out, he has to kiss me on the cheek to wake me up. He kisses me on the cheek a lot. He doesn't know it, but he never really knocks me out. I just like getting kisses on the cheek.
Just yesterday, he started Kindergarten. I didn't think his Mom was going to keep it together, but she did better than me. He doesn't know this, but I cried. I was OK -- really -- until he started crying as we left. That was about all I could take. Funny, but I seem to cry a lot more now that I have kids.
Yesterday, he was holding my hand and smiling from ear to ear. We'd just got off the church bus on a youth church trip and I'd been silly around all his friends on the bus. All his friends were laughing, and he really likes it when I'm silly. He likes thinking that his friends think I'm the cool Dad.
I coached his first baseball game yesterday. He loves to pitch. He's a natural. He could throw a ball from the day he could pick one up. He also plays 3rd base. That's where his favorite player, Aaron Boone, plays for the Reds. He loves the Reds. Wonder how that happened? Why, just yesterday, I was holding him in my arms in the yellow seats at Riverfront Stadium when Aaron Boone hit a walk-off home run to win the game. We bounced up and down together as the ball landed just a few rows from us.
In fact, yesterday, he got to meet Aaron at RedsFest. We go to the Reds fan festival every year. We stood in line to meet Aaron, and when we got to him, Aaron just scooped him up in his arms like he was his own, and Mom took their picture together. It's a great picture. But he has lots of pictures with Reds players.
You know what else was cool? Yesterday he went with his baseball team to the George Foster baseball camp, and got to work with the 1977 National League MVP himself. He and all his buddies got their picture with big George and got to play baseball with the man. Most boys his age don't know who George Foster is, but my son took pride in telling them all about him.
Yesterday, we played a song together at church. He actually helped me write it. It's a Christmas song, and I know he's not very old, but he really helped with the lyrics and had some solid suggestions about the song. We practiced it and sang it at church. Everybody seemed to really like it. His mom was proud. I think he might have the makings of a good musician.
I had a long day yesterday. I was the substitute teacher for his 6th grade class. A lot of his baseball buddies are in the class with him. I sorta abandoned the outline the teacher left for me, and instead, we played a game where I would quote a line from a movie, and they would have to guess the name of the movie. He says its the most fun he ever had a with a substitute teacher.
Yesterday was his 12th birthday, and he celebrated by pitching his traveling team to a victory in their first game of the year. Complete game. What a great time. I like being his coach very much, and I just had to give him the start, what with it being his birthday and all.
He started junior high school yesterday. Jr. High! Where does the time go? I thought he'd be a little upset with us moving him to a different school away from all his friends. But he loves it. Didn't bat an eye. He says he really likes it, and there's only two other boys in his whole class. He thinks that's kinda cool.
Yesterday we got back from Washington DC. His 7th grade class took a field trip there. And I was lucky enough to be one of the chaperons. We had a blast, him and me and his buddies. He says I was the coolest Dad on the trip. He still likes his friends thinking I'm cool.
We met his first girlfriend yesterday. She's a cutie.
And then, yesterday, we just got back from a vacation with his girlfriend's family. We all really enjoyed ourselves. The weather was great in Hilton Head. It was the first time we'd ever been there. In the pool one day, he was protecting his girl. I would pretend to try to get her, and he'd fight me off. Stayed between me and her the whole time. And she clung to him pretty close. We also took a boat ride to look for dolphins. It was pretty cute watching him and her together, giggling, just digging be kids at that moment, at that time. Got a great picture of the two of them laughing together on the boat. Pretty special.
I baptized him yesterday. I don't think I can tell you about it though. Not without crying.
My boy became a teenager yesterday. All he wanted for his 13th birthday was to go to the Reds Opening Day. So that's what we did. Unfortunately, the weather was kinda nasty yesterday, and even though they got the game in, the Reds lost 2-4. But he didn't care. He just liked being there, just me and him. We had a great time.
He's a good drummer, my boy. Yesterday, I had the pleasure of playing worship at church with him playing drums right beside me. He's worked his way up from just playing bongos and percussion on Wednesday nights. Now he's on the kit, in the big service on Sunday mornings. And he loves it. I love it too.
Yesterday, he started high school. I can't believe it. My boy's in high school. He's been playing ball with the school baseball team all summer, and he was really looking forward to getting started. He seems to really like it. In fact, yesterday, he came home from school and told me and his mom how he really looks forward to going to school everyday. Imagine, a teenage boy enjoying school.
Yesterday, the girl broke up with him. It's his first break up. I wonder how he'll take it. My heart hurts for them both.
I had a bad vertigo attack yesterday. I tried to make it all the way home, but I couldn't. So he drove me the rest of the way home. Even though he's only had his permit a couple of months, and he's only driven the big 15-passenger van a few times, and we were on the side of I-465, he hopped in the seat and drove me home like a pro. We even had to stop on the side of the road a couple of times for me to throw up. No worries. Like he's been doing it for years.
We took him yesterday to buy his first car. Are you kidding me? I think he got what a wanted. A pretty cool Durango. We got a good deal on it. And it's big enough he can carry his drums around. Maybe now, he'll get more excited about driving.
Yesterday, he started his first game of his Junior year at first base. He's the starter there this year. He's spent the last two years backing up the previous starter, and now its his turn. We're pretty excited about this year.
We took him to visit the college he wants to go to yesterday. Middle Tennessee State. It's the only place he's applied to. He wants to study Audio Engineering. That's pretty cool. Plus, there's a Red Lobster nearby, so he can get all the Cheddar Bay biscuits he wants.
Yesterday was the first day of his Senior year. Wasn't it just yesterday he started Kindergarten?
This isn't a story that's unique to us. Billions of parents since Old Testament times could tell this same story. Long before we got here, they could tell us what yesterday was all about. Some of you right now know what I'm talking about. You know what yesterday feels like. We have dear friends who've been robbed of some of their yesterdays, and so they have less of them to remember than I do, but they're no less special to them. Even more special, in some ways.
All that's left now are tomorrows. And I wonder what kind of yesterdays all those tomorrows will become. And I look forward very much to knowing what happened yesterday.
But I want to share one more.
Yesterday he was just seven years old. I was at the hospital all day with my wife. She has a brain tumor, and was in surgery all day. Literally, all day. I was tired -- physically, but mostly, emotionally. Friends and family had been by all day to check in on us. My ministers had been there to pray with me. Even the wife's Step-Dad's mom came by. She's so sweet.
But MeMe and Grandpa got him from school and took him to his baseball game. And then they brought him to the hospital to see us. His mom wasn't out of surgery yet. But he won his game and had a smile on his face. He was still wearing his baseball uniform.
So he crawled up on my lap, put his arms around my neck, and let me cry on his shoulder. He held me, and comforted me, mature way beyond his years, and told me it would all be OK. Turns out, he was right.
Yesterday, he was seven years old.
Tomorrow, he'll turn 18.
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Standing by Your Convictions
I have my reservations about this blog. Not because I don't wholeheartedly believe in the point I'll try to make or stand behind my opinion, but because I know full well there will be those who will misinterpret my meaning, or worse, refuse to attempt to understand the premise and will instead move toward labeling me a "phobe" or a "hater" or even just a "religious fanatic."
I don't mind at all if someone purely disagrees with me. In fact, I welcome the discourse, as I know without a doubt there are others who simply don't hold the same standards I do. But I also realize that I'm inviting what will surely be little more than out and out ridicule because of some ill-perceived prejudice.
With that, I want to address Ohio Republican Representative Rob Portman's decision to now support gay marriage, a decision that is a reversal from his previous stance to oppose it. For years, Rep. Portman has supported the conservative charge to protect the sanctity of the Biblical definition of marriage -- matrimony between a man and woman. One can only assume that he supported those views because they were his convictions, based, one would hope, on years of Biblical teaching and knowledge. As a Christian conservative, I would hate to think he just randomly chose that position on no real substance, or just on an off opinion, or worse, for personal or political gain. And it is that assumption that makes his new revelation so unsettling.
So why did he change his stance? Because his son is gay.
At least his son believes he is. The only reason given for Portman's reversal of opinion is because his son told him he was gay.
Now, the point of this blog is not to try to convince you gay marriage should or shouldn't be legal. I do not support it -- so there -- but that's not the point of this writing. In fact, I don't even think the gay marriage debate is the most pressing issue facing our country today and am quite frankly bothered that it gets so much press when the US faces far more dire problems. No, this is not a gay marriage debate.
Rather, I am bothered by the reason for his change of mind and the message it sends.
Again, if was can assume the good Rep's stance on gay marriage was based on a lifetime of convictions, then the fact that he changed his mind simply because his son violated those convictions is truly troubling. What kind of message does it send to our children when we tell them we have a certain set of standards, only and up until they choose to violate them?
In other words, Rep. Portman could just have easily have said, "I've been against armed robbery my whole life, but last night, my son held up a liquor store with a gun, and I just don't think we should punish people for that anymore." How would that have gone over in the media?
Or how about this? "I've always thought child-molesting was wrong, but ever since my son molested that 10-year old girl, I just don't think its all that bad anymore." Think Brian Williams would have let that slide from a conservative politician?
You may think I'm taking this to an extreme. Am I? We're not talking about some casual observer who had a change of heart one day. We're talking about a guy who had such moral standards that he was able to convince thousands of people to vote to send him to Washington to advance those beliefs. This is a man who felt so strongly about the issue and felt he had enough education on it that he actually voted for laws against it! He felt strongly enough about it he wanted to outlaw it. That's extreme!
And what changed his mind? His son violated those beliefs. And all of the sudden, he thinks he's been wrong all these years.
Some people would see that as enlightened. That he was able to see through the darkness and realize the error of his ways and be big enough to admit he was wrong and come clean. I see it as cowardly.
I have children. Two boys. I'm not speaking out of ignorance. I know what it means to support your children, and to want the best for them, and to love them unconditionally, and to sacrifice for them, and to believe in them and to want what's best for them. But there is a line. If one of my children should break a law, I've taught them that there are consequences for that and that they would be punished. I would not expect the authorities to change the laws to accommodate them.
In the same way, I've raised them with a certain set of standards. I've raised them to believe a certain set of morals and ethics I hope they will adhere to as they grow up. I've taught them that if they violate those beliefs, bad things can happen. While I'm not naive enough to think they will never adjust those standards to their own lives based on their own experiences, or even violate them sometimes for any number of reasons, what I haven't taught them is that if someday they should choose a different path, I'll just abandon my own convictions and support them blindly.
Worse, those standards and ethics and morals and beliefs, and even some of the laws, are based on something that never changes: the Bible. We get our belief structure based on a belief in Jesus and his Holy Word. We didn't just make this stuff up. I was raised with those beliefs and I passed them on to my children. It works for us.
But if someday my child should decide it no longer works for him, I'm not just gonna drop everything I've ever believed in and support him. I'm going to love him, but I'm also going to be clear that I believe his decisions will have dire consequences and that I cannot support actions that violate my convictions.
A year or so ago, I read an article on FoxNews.com by a lady named Shari Johnson. Never heard of her before (or since, for that matter) so I don't know anything about her. But her article bothered me -- a lot. She claimed to be a lifelong Christian, she wrote, with a lifetime steeped in Biblical teaching. Turned out, she's got a lesbian daughter. Without boring you with all the details (you can read it here) she basically said that now that her daughter was gay, she musta been wrong all these years about the Bible.
Remember, she called it just fine when her kid was straight. But even though she'd been a Christian her whole life and believed homosexuality was wrong based on the Bible, now that she had a lesbian kid, she's had it all wrong. Surely being gay can't be all that bad after all, so the Bible must be wrong. Without any actual analysis of Scripture in the article, she just concludes that she's misinterpreted it forever.
In other words, she couldn't bring herself to condemn her own daughter. So instead, she changed a belief system that had been in place for decades. The Bible is OK until it condemns someone we love. When it does, then it can no longer be the standard. She even makes this statement: "When I asked a wise friend how she reconciled the scriptures with her daughter’s homosexuality, she said, “'I can’t. So I just let God sort it out.'”
I don't mind at all if someone purely disagrees with me. In fact, I welcome the discourse, as I know without a doubt there are others who simply don't hold the same standards I do. But I also realize that I'm inviting what will surely be little more than out and out ridicule because of some ill-perceived prejudice.
With that, I want to address Ohio Republican Representative Rob Portman's decision to now support gay marriage, a decision that is a reversal from his previous stance to oppose it. For years, Rep. Portman has supported the conservative charge to protect the sanctity of the Biblical definition of marriage -- matrimony between a man and woman. One can only assume that he supported those views because they were his convictions, based, one would hope, on years of Biblical teaching and knowledge. As a Christian conservative, I would hate to think he just randomly chose that position on no real substance, or just on an off opinion, or worse, for personal or political gain. And it is that assumption that makes his new revelation so unsettling.
So why did he change his stance? Because his son is gay.
At least his son believes he is. The only reason given for Portman's reversal of opinion is because his son told him he was gay.
Now, the point of this blog is not to try to convince you gay marriage should or shouldn't be legal. I do not support it -- so there -- but that's not the point of this writing. In fact, I don't even think the gay marriage debate is the most pressing issue facing our country today and am quite frankly bothered that it gets so much press when the US faces far more dire problems. No, this is not a gay marriage debate.
Rather, I am bothered by the reason for his change of mind and the message it sends.
Again, if was can assume the good Rep's stance on gay marriage was based on a lifetime of convictions, then the fact that he changed his mind simply because his son violated those convictions is truly troubling. What kind of message does it send to our children when we tell them we have a certain set of standards, only and up until they choose to violate them?
In other words, Rep. Portman could just have easily have said, "I've been against armed robbery my whole life, but last night, my son held up a liquor store with a gun, and I just don't think we should punish people for that anymore." How would that have gone over in the media?
Or how about this? "I've always thought child-molesting was wrong, but ever since my son molested that 10-year old girl, I just don't think its all that bad anymore." Think Brian Williams would have let that slide from a conservative politician?
You may think I'm taking this to an extreme. Am I? We're not talking about some casual observer who had a change of heart one day. We're talking about a guy who had such moral standards that he was able to convince thousands of people to vote to send him to Washington to advance those beliefs. This is a man who felt so strongly about the issue and felt he had enough education on it that he actually voted for laws against it! He felt strongly enough about it he wanted to outlaw it. That's extreme!
And what changed his mind? His son violated those beliefs. And all of the sudden, he thinks he's been wrong all these years.
Some people would see that as enlightened. That he was able to see through the darkness and realize the error of his ways and be big enough to admit he was wrong and come clean. I see it as cowardly.
I have children. Two boys. I'm not speaking out of ignorance. I know what it means to support your children, and to want the best for them, and to love them unconditionally, and to sacrifice for them, and to believe in them and to want what's best for them. But there is a line. If one of my children should break a law, I've taught them that there are consequences for that and that they would be punished. I would not expect the authorities to change the laws to accommodate them.
In the same way, I've raised them with a certain set of standards. I've raised them to believe a certain set of morals and ethics I hope they will adhere to as they grow up. I've taught them that if they violate those beliefs, bad things can happen. While I'm not naive enough to think they will never adjust those standards to their own lives based on their own experiences, or even violate them sometimes for any number of reasons, what I haven't taught them is that if someday they should choose a different path, I'll just abandon my own convictions and support them blindly.
Worse, those standards and ethics and morals and beliefs, and even some of the laws, are based on something that never changes: the Bible. We get our belief structure based on a belief in Jesus and his Holy Word. We didn't just make this stuff up. I was raised with those beliefs and I passed them on to my children. It works for us.
But if someday my child should decide it no longer works for him, I'm not just gonna drop everything I've ever believed in and support him. I'm going to love him, but I'm also going to be clear that I believe his decisions will have dire consequences and that I cannot support actions that violate my convictions.
A year or so ago, I read an article on FoxNews.com by a lady named Shari Johnson. Never heard of her before (or since, for that matter) so I don't know anything about her. But her article bothered me -- a lot. She claimed to be a lifelong Christian, she wrote, with a lifetime steeped in Biblical teaching. Turned out, she's got a lesbian daughter. Without boring you with all the details (you can read it here) she basically said that now that her daughter was gay, she musta been wrong all these years about the Bible.
Remember, she called it just fine when her kid was straight. But even though she'd been a Christian her whole life and believed homosexuality was wrong based on the Bible, now that she had a lesbian kid, she's had it all wrong. Surely being gay can't be all that bad after all, so the Bible must be wrong. Without any actual analysis of Scripture in the article, she just concludes that she's misinterpreted it forever.
In other words, she couldn't bring herself to condemn her own daughter. So instead, she changed a belief system that had been in place for decades. The Bible is OK until it condemns someone we love. When it does, then it can no longer be the standard. She even makes this statement: "When I asked a wise friend how she reconciled the scriptures with her daughter’s homosexuality, she said, “'I can’t. So I just let God sort it out.'”
Rep. Portman has done the same thing. He has compromised his own beliefs all because he can't fathom his son as a sinner. His son, for all we know, is probably a good guy, and Rep. Portman can't comprehend that God might actually one day punish his son for this. So, easier to just change his views and be done with it. No sense standing by your convictions.
That's cowardly, and indicative, I believe, of the overall moral decline of our society. Rather than holding each other accountable, it's easier to overlook the indiscretion, and even worse, just say that it wasn't really all that bad to begin with. We all watch the news every night and complain about how the world is going to hell in a handbasket, but then wilt under our own pressure instead of standing up for what we believe is right.
And our kids grow up thinking its OK to just do whatever they think feels good at the time, because there really are no consequences.
Liberal progressives have been pushing that baloney on us for years. Now we have Republican conservatives succumbing as well. When will it stop?
Support gay marriage, or don't support it, I really don't care. But for crying out load, grow a pair and stand up for what you believe in and stick to it. Teach your children that there is a difference between right and wrong and that if you make bad decisions, bad things come of it. Because if you don't, things will only get worse.
Proud to be an American
I'm sitting here this morning watching the movie Miracle, about the 1980 United States Olympic hockey team. I've seen it several times before. I love this movie.
The ironic part is that I literally cannot stand hockey as a sport. As an endless list of statistics and polls show, I am not alone, as the overwhelming majority of Americans are not big hockey fans. Our sports are baseball, football and basketball.
But I love this story. I was just 10 years old when the US team beat the Soviet Union -- a team who hadn't lost an international title in over 20 years -- and even at that young age, I was just beginning to understand the political tension of the time. The peril our country was in over a woefully failing presidential administration, and the debacle that was the Iranian hostage situation at the time.
Somehow, this team full of college kids were able to galvanize the whole country at a time when it was desperately needed, and they beat a team that was not only the greatest hockey team in the world at the time, but also from a country that was Enemy #1 to America.
It's an amazing story. From a sheer sports standpoint, it really was the equivalent of, say, our local high school Mooresville Pioneer baseball team actually beating the New York Yankees at the peak of their world championship run at the beginning of the last decade. And not in a Spring training game either.
But it was so much bigger than that because of the political and social ramifications the game actually held. The country was desperate for something to believe in -- something to make us all feel good about being Americans again. Somehow, these kids beating the evil Russians did that for us.
Every citizen who calls themselves an American ought to be required to watch this movie, or even better, the documentary that HBO did on the team, that is coincidentally included with the DVD. If you're not moved to tears when Al Michaels asks the iconic question, "Do you believe in Miracles? Yes!" then something is wrong with you.
I'm reminded of all this as I watch this movie because last night -- in a sport far more dear to my heart -- the United States baseball team was eliminated from the World Baseball Classic.
If you're not a baseball fan, then you've probably never heard of the World Baseball Classic. It's certainly not the same stage as the Olympics. But for baseball loving nations -- and there are many, including the US, -- its a fairly big deal. This year's tournament was the third since its start. Held every four years since 2005, its featured teams from all over the world, from countries where baseball literally is everything to them.
The United States -- featuring what is clearly the leading professional baseball league in the world -- has never won the WBC. Japan has won the previous two, and has again advanced to the final round this year, while the US team was eliminated last night by Puerto Rico. This year's US team was considered one of the favorites, and many are left this morning wondering why they've lost again.
There are those who believe the US doesn't take this tournament seriously enough, and that on this world stage we simply ought to be doing a better job. Ken Rosenthal, the lead baseball beat writer for Fox Sports, wrote an article this morning questioning whether or not the US is truly committed to the WBC, and if the United State's best baseball players really care about playing in it.
Those are valid questions, and the truth is that the answers are probably no to both. The US isn't truly committed to it, and the players don't care all that much.
There's a couple of easy reasons for this. 1) The United States has the best professional baseball league in the world, featuring the best players in the world, many from other countries who subsequently play for their home countries, and not the US team, in the WBC. Many of the MLB's best players are not from the US, so it thins out the talent pool. Plus, Major League Baseball is a big business, with lots of money on the line, and teams in it -- like my Cincinnati Reds -- are somewhat reluctant to let their players play at the risk of injury or some other problem that would jeopardize their ability to play for the team that employs them and pays them lots of that money. Makes sense, in a way, if you're the owner and members of team who relies on such players for their own livelihoods.
2) US fans, on the whole, really do not care. That is to say, they don't care as much about the US WBC team as they do about their own favorite MLB team. I'm as big a baseball fan as any, but I'm a Cincinnati Reds fan, and I'll admit that I was much more concerned about the Reds players who played in the WBC getting back to Spring training than I was about their involvement in the WBC. I wanted to see the US do well, but I'm not unhappy that Brandon Phillips will get back to the Reds in one piece. On the other hand, I couldn't give a rip about the Canadian team, and I was thrilled when they were eliminated so Joey Votto could get back to my team. Many players on the Reds are from foreign countries. There's no way I want them risking injury to play for teams like the Dominican Republic.
But this is not the case for most other nations. Most other countries don't have a professional league like the US, and indeed their best players usually leave and end up playing Major League Baseball anyway. So when the WBC rolls around, and their best players return to represent their home countries, its cause for a national celebration. In the Dominican, where baseball is literally everything, and they have no other national sport -- no football, basketball or soccer -- the WBC is very likely the pinnacle of their national pride. In the US, where we can follow our Reds, Yankees or Cardinals every day, a little three-week tourney every four years simply isn't that big of a deal. Japan has a good professional league, but nothing on the lines of the MLB. The WBC is a VERY big deal in Japan.
But there is a bigger reason than both of those: 3) American Pride is dead right now.
I don't want to sound like a pessimist, but its true. Being proud of the US is not cool right now. At least, that's what we're being told every night on the evening news, and even by our own government leaders. As in the days of the 1980 US hockey team, our country finds itself in political, societal and financial upheaval. And even though President Carter of those years was a poor president, the difference between then and now is that, back then, there was still a desire for the US to be great, for it to be a leader in the world. The country, even its leader, was looking for ways for the US to be great again.
It's not that way today.
Our current President doesn't like America very much, and has spent much of his time in office telling everybody who will listen why the United States is to blame for much of the world's problems. His administration and those who subscribe to his political ideology, along with the help of the national media, are expending a lot of energy to convince Americans that they should dislike each other. They tell us that being successful isn't something to be celebrated, but rather, something to be punished, especially financially. And they tell us that if someone is successful, that somehow they're bad people who don't deserve the riches they've earned.
And instead of having a single enemy -- like the evil Russians -- a foe which we can all get behind defeating, we are told every day that the whole world doesn't like us, and its our own fault. And moreover, we shouldn't even like each other very much for being the kind of people that the rest of the world abhor. Today, failure and mediocrity is something our government not only encourages, it rewards!
At least that's what we're being told. So is it any surprise that we can't get behind a little baseball team like the US WBC team, when we're being told day in and day out that the causes of the United States aren't worth getting behind at all? My own Reds' player on the WBC team, Brandon Phillips, said it best after last night's loss to Puerto Rico when he stated, "You just see how everybody’s passion is totally different than our country’s."
He's right. But it's not his fault. It's ours. Oh, for the 1980 US hockey team. Wouldn't it feel great to be proud to be an American again? I was only 10, but I miss those days.
The ironic part is that I literally cannot stand hockey as a sport. As an endless list of statistics and polls show, I am not alone, as the overwhelming majority of Americans are not big hockey fans. Our sports are baseball, football and basketball.
But I love this story. I was just 10 years old when the US team beat the Soviet Union -- a team who hadn't lost an international title in over 20 years -- and even at that young age, I was just beginning to understand the political tension of the time. The peril our country was in over a woefully failing presidential administration, and the debacle that was the Iranian hostage situation at the time.
Somehow, this team full of college kids were able to galvanize the whole country at a time when it was desperately needed, and they beat a team that was not only the greatest hockey team in the world at the time, but also from a country that was Enemy #1 to America.
It's an amazing story. From a sheer sports standpoint, it really was the equivalent of, say, our local high school Mooresville Pioneer baseball team actually beating the New York Yankees at the peak of their world championship run at the beginning of the last decade. And not in a Spring training game either.
But it was so much bigger than that because of the political and social ramifications the game actually held. The country was desperate for something to believe in -- something to make us all feel good about being Americans again. Somehow, these kids beating the evil Russians did that for us.
Every citizen who calls themselves an American ought to be required to watch this movie, or even better, the documentary that HBO did on the team, that is coincidentally included with the DVD. If you're not moved to tears when Al Michaels asks the iconic question, "Do you believe in Miracles? Yes!" then something is wrong with you.
I'm reminded of all this as I watch this movie because last night -- in a sport far more dear to my heart -- the United States baseball team was eliminated from the World Baseball Classic.
If you're not a baseball fan, then you've probably never heard of the World Baseball Classic. It's certainly not the same stage as the Olympics. But for baseball loving nations -- and there are many, including the US, -- its a fairly big deal. This year's tournament was the third since its start. Held every four years since 2005, its featured teams from all over the world, from countries where baseball literally is everything to them.
The United States -- featuring what is clearly the leading professional baseball league in the world -- has never won the WBC. Japan has won the previous two, and has again advanced to the final round this year, while the US team was eliminated last night by Puerto Rico. This year's US team was considered one of the favorites, and many are left this morning wondering why they've lost again.
There are those who believe the US doesn't take this tournament seriously enough, and that on this world stage we simply ought to be doing a better job. Ken Rosenthal, the lead baseball beat writer for Fox Sports, wrote an article this morning questioning whether or not the US is truly committed to the WBC, and if the United State's best baseball players really care about playing in it.
Those are valid questions, and the truth is that the answers are probably no to both. The US isn't truly committed to it, and the players don't care all that much.
There's a couple of easy reasons for this. 1) The United States has the best professional baseball league in the world, featuring the best players in the world, many from other countries who subsequently play for their home countries, and not the US team, in the WBC. Many of the MLB's best players are not from the US, so it thins out the talent pool. Plus, Major League Baseball is a big business, with lots of money on the line, and teams in it -- like my Cincinnati Reds -- are somewhat reluctant to let their players play at the risk of injury or some other problem that would jeopardize their ability to play for the team that employs them and pays them lots of that money. Makes sense, in a way, if you're the owner and members of team who relies on such players for their own livelihoods.
2) US fans, on the whole, really do not care. That is to say, they don't care as much about the US WBC team as they do about their own favorite MLB team. I'm as big a baseball fan as any, but I'm a Cincinnati Reds fan, and I'll admit that I was much more concerned about the Reds players who played in the WBC getting back to Spring training than I was about their involvement in the WBC. I wanted to see the US do well, but I'm not unhappy that Brandon Phillips will get back to the Reds in one piece. On the other hand, I couldn't give a rip about the Canadian team, and I was thrilled when they were eliminated so Joey Votto could get back to my team. Many players on the Reds are from foreign countries. There's no way I want them risking injury to play for teams like the Dominican Republic.
But this is not the case for most other nations. Most other countries don't have a professional league like the US, and indeed their best players usually leave and end up playing Major League Baseball anyway. So when the WBC rolls around, and their best players return to represent their home countries, its cause for a national celebration. In the Dominican, where baseball is literally everything, and they have no other national sport -- no football, basketball or soccer -- the WBC is very likely the pinnacle of their national pride. In the US, where we can follow our Reds, Yankees or Cardinals every day, a little three-week tourney every four years simply isn't that big of a deal. Japan has a good professional league, but nothing on the lines of the MLB. The WBC is a VERY big deal in Japan.
But there is a bigger reason than both of those: 3) American Pride is dead right now.
I don't want to sound like a pessimist, but its true. Being proud of the US is not cool right now. At least, that's what we're being told every night on the evening news, and even by our own government leaders. As in the days of the 1980 US hockey team, our country finds itself in political, societal and financial upheaval. And even though President Carter of those years was a poor president, the difference between then and now is that, back then, there was still a desire for the US to be great, for it to be a leader in the world. The country, even its leader, was looking for ways for the US to be great again.
It's not that way today.
Our current President doesn't like America very much, and has spent much of his time in office telling everybody who will listen why the United States is to blame for much of the world's problems. His administration and those who subscribe to his political ideology, along with the help of the national media, are expending a lot of energy to convince Americans that they should dislike each other. They tell us that being successful isn't something to be celebrated, but rather, something to be punished, especially financially. And they tell us that if someone is successful, that somehow they're bad people who don't deserve the riches they've earned.
And instead of having a single enemy -- like the evil Russians -- a foe which we can all get behind defeating, we are told every day that the whole world doesn't like us, and its our own fault. And moreover, we shouldn't even like each other very much for being the kind of people that the rest of the world abhor. Today, failure and mediocrity is something our government not only encourages, it rewards!
At least that's what we're being told. So is it any surprise that we can't get behind a little baseball team like the US WBC team, when we're being told day in and day out that the causes of the United States aren't worth getting behind at all? My own Reds' player on the WBC team, Brandon Phillips, said it best after last night's loss to Puerto Rico when he stated, "You just see how everybody’s passion is totally different than our country’s."
He's right. But it's not his fault. It's ours. Oh, for the 1980 US hockey team. Wouldn't it feel great to be proud to be an American again? I was only 10, but I miss those days.
Monday, February 4, 2013
I'm Sittin' by Her!
The other day, a friend of mine mentioned that she had thought of me earlier in the week. She relayed a story about going out to dinner with some friends and that when she and her husband arrived for dinner, the friends were already there, and were seated diagonally from each other at the table. My friend, having had a stressful day, wanted to sit next to her husband, so she asked her friends to move so she could do so.
I was flattered she thought of me. She was reminded of a story my friend had told her about how I always insist on sitting next to my wife no matter who we're with or where we are.
I like sitting by my wife... a lot.
I'm not happy when I'm not near her. I'm away from her enough as it is, what with work and the regular rigors of everyday life. And so, when I get the chance to be with her, I want to be close to her. It's one of the reasons I married her, in addition to her cute butt.
When I tell others about this, any girls in the midst usually giggle and coo and tell me how sweet that is. This always puzzles me, as I can't fathom someone marrying someone next to whom they wouldn't want to sit on a regular basis. I'm baffled by any husband who found a woman attractive and intriguing enough that they married them, only to decide later that they don't like sitting next to them in a restaurant.
Which, of course, begs the question: How does this happen?
I'm not really sure, except to say that I don't think guys think far enough ahead before they get married.
My buddy of 25 years -- who is not merely a buddy, but more of a brother, so much so that we often introduce each other to others as brothers for simplicity sake -- will tell you that I am not happy when I am not close to my wife. He can regale you with stories in which I have become downright snippy, even in public, when denied the opportunity to be next to my wife, whether it be at a table in a restaurant, or a line at the theater, or the pew at church.
I love my wife very much. She is my best friend and I am comforted when she is near me. Very recently, I was supremely cared for by a friend who by happenstance was the nurse in the recovery room in which I was placed following surgery on my shoulder. I was having quite a bit of trouble recovering from the anesthesia. While this friend of mine was the greatest (thanks Sharon!) she can also now tell you of my desire to have my wife by my side and the calming effect it has on me.
So I don't get it when I meet guys who do everything they can to get away from their wives. It's true, I've met a lot of women who are hard to get along with. Sometimes, their husbands knew this before they married them and did it anyway. Sometimes, after the fact the woman decides she's tired of being likeable. But I've found one thing to be true: If the husband remains the kind of guy a wife wants to sit next to, the wife usually remains that kind of girl.
So here's my advice to young men (although youse girls would do well to follow the same advice.) When you're sizing up your partner to see if she's spouse material, be sure you're asking the right questions. Don't worry about what she'll look like in the morning, or whether she likes the toilet paper to come off the top of the roll or the bottom. Don't worry about the in-laws. Don't get caught up on how good the sex will be, because some day you won't look like you do now. It's not really even about who you want to grow old with, although that's close.
No, you better find someone you like. Whoever said you shouldn't date/marry your friend was a moron.
The question you ought to ask is: Is she someone I'll always want to sit next to?
I was flattered she thought of me. She was reminded of a story my friend had told her about how I always insist on sitting next to my wife no matter who we're with or where we are.
I like sitting by my wife... a lot.
I'm not happy when I'm not near her. I'm away from her enough as it is, what with work and the regular rigors of everyday life. And so, when I get the chance to be with her, I want to be close to her. It's one of the reasons I married her, in addition to her cute butt.
When I tell others about this, any girls in the midst usually giggle and coo and tell me how sweet that is. This always puzzles me, as I can't fathom someone marrying someone next to whom they wouldn't want to sit on a regular basis. I'm baffled by any husband who found a woman attractive and intriguing enough that they married them, only to decide later that they don't like sitting next to them in a restaurant.
Which, of course, begs the question: How does this happen?
I'm not really sure, except to say that I don't think guys think far enough ahead before they get married.
My buddy of 25 years -- who is not merely a buddy, but more of a brother, so much so that we often introduce each other to others as brothers for simplicity sake -- will tell you that I am not happy when I am not close to my wife. He can regale you with stories in which I have become downright snippy, even in public, when denied the opportunity to be next to my wife, whether it be at a table in a restaurant, or a line at the theater, or the pew at church.
I love my wife very much. She is my best friend and I am comforted when she is near me. Very recently, I was supremely cared for by a friend who by happenstance was the nurse in the recovery room in which I was placed following surgery on my shoulder. I was having quite a bit of trouble recovering from the anesthesia. While this friend of mine was the greatest (thanks Sharon!) she can also now tell you of my desire to have my wife by my side and the calming effect it has on me.
So I don't get it when I meet guys who do everything they can to get away from their wives. It's true, I've met a lot of women who are hard to get along with. Sometimes, their husbands knew this before they married them and did it anyway. Sometimes, after the fact the woman decides she's tired of being likeable. But I've found one thing to be true: If the husband remains the kind of guy a wife wants to sit next to, the wife usually remains that kind of girl.
So here's my advice to young men (although youse girls would do well to follow the same advice.) When you're sizing up your partner to see if she's spouse material, be sure you're asking the right questions. Don't worry about what she'll look like in the morning, or whether she likes the toilet paper to come off the top of the roll or the bottom. Don't worry about the in-laws. Don't get caught up on how good the sex will be, because some day you won't look like you do now. It's not really even about who you want to grow old with, although that's close.
No, you better find someone you like. Whoever said you shouldn't date/marry your friend was a moron.
The question you ought to ask is: Is she someone I'll always want to sit next to?
Saturday, January 5, 2013
Kick 'em All Out!
Take a stroll through Facebook at any given time and you'll find at least one -- and likely multiple -- posts involving the advocating of removing and/or holding accountable members of congress. Today, I saw a post that has a picture accompanying it that breaks down and simplifies the current budget and deficit problems our country faces. The post's owner wrote "When are we gonna hold Congress accountable?"
Over the few years I've been on Facebook, I've seen hundreds, maybe thousands of posts urging us to hold them accountable, write our congressperson, or even kick 'em all out and start over.
But see, therein lies the problem: I don't have the ability to kick congress out and start over. I only have the ability to affect three congressmen out of the nearly 700. And so do you. I can attempt to kick out only one House member, and two Senators, and that chance only comes every couple of years.
The problem is that everybody thinks everybody in Congress is terrible at their jobs -- except for their own guy or girl. You see, if I didn't think my guy was any good, (or at least me and the majority of my neighbors) he wouldn't be in the job in the first place. Most people think, "Everybody in Congress is a bunch of crooks -- except my guy."
I like my representative. That's why I voted for him. I usually like my Senators. Most of the time, my guy wins. He didn't this year, but I digress. Somebody (actually, a lot of people) apparently really likes Nancy Pelosi, although I can't for the sake of God figure out why.
In today's divided climate, ask any voter (and people who don't vote, but complain anyway) whether we should kick everybody out and start over, and most will probably say yes. But we don't have the power to do that. We can only vote for our guy! And if people are unwilling to oust their guy, then nothing is really ever going to change.
Personally, I think Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and others of their ilk are a big part of the problem in which this county now finds itself, but I don't get to vote for them. And as much as I hate to admit it, that's a good thing. In as much as I'm sure the folks out in California don't want some hayseed like me from Indiana voting for the people who would represent them, I sure don't want those nutbars from San Francisco voting for the guy who represents me.
And that's an important principle to understand. I voted for Dan Coats and Todd Young so that they would do what they think is best for me and my neighbors. I'd like to think they will always look at the big picture, but the reality is that I don't want them looking out for the people of California, or Montana, or New Jersey, or the Virgin Islands for that matter. I want them looking out for me. And if you're honest, you want the same from your representatives. I didn't vote for my reps so they would further the agenda of New York City. I voted for them so they will further the agenda of Mooresville, Indiana.
Don't misunderstand: I'm not at all saying you shouldn't vote. In fact, I don't think enough people vote. I certainly don't think enough informed people vote -- or maybe I should say too many uninformed people vote. In either case, I think its extremely important to vote for representative you believe values the same ideals and standards as yourself. And hope and pray others do the same.
There's a lot broken in Congress. I believe that. And I believe if they don't have a collective change of heart soon then there's going to be hell to pay -- literally. But while I don't have the power to kick 'em all out and start over, I can hope and pray that enough people value the same things I do -- God, family, small government, wise budgeting and spending, personal responsibility, and a strong military and sense of freedom -- and will vote those values when they have the chance. By doing so, perhaps they will tip the majority in that direction. With congress so evenly divided, it is during these times when we truly see how important it is to have even just one right person voting in our favor.
And remember this when you do vote: both sides feel the same way.
Over the few years I've been on Facebook, I've seen hundreds, maybe thousands of posts urging us to hold them accountable, write our congressperson, or even kick 'em all out and start over.
But see, therein lies the problem: I don't have the ability to kick congress out and start over. I only have the ability to affect three congressmen out of the nearly 700. And so do you. I can attempt to kick out only one House member, and two Senators, and that chance only comes every couple of years.
The problem is that everybody thinks everybody in Congress is terrible at their jobs -- except for their own guy or girl. You see, if I didn't think my guy was any good, (or at least me and the majority of my neighbors) he wouldn't be in the job in the first place. Most people think, "Everybody in Congress is a bunch of crooks -- except my guy."
I like my representative. That's why I voted for him. I usually like my Senators. Most of the time, my guy wins. He didn't this year, but I digress. Somebody (actually, a lot of people) apparently really likes Nancy Pelosi, although I can't for the sake of God figure out why.
In today's divided climate, ask any voter (and people who don't vote, but complain anyway) whether we should kick everybody out and start over, and most will probably say yes. But we don't have the power to do that. We can only vote for our guy! And if people are unwilling to oust their guy, then nothing is really ever going to change.
Personally, I think Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and others of their ilk are a big part of the problem in which this county now finds itself, but I don't get to vote for them. And as much as I hate to admit it, that's a good thing. In as much as I'm sure the folks out in California don't want some hayseed like me from Indiana voting for the people who would represent them, I sure don't want those nutbars from San Francisco voting for the guy who represents me.
And that's an important principle to understand. I voted for Dan Coats and Todd Young so that they would do what they think is best for me and my neighbors. I'd like to think they will always look at the big picture, but the reality is that I don't want them looking out for the people of California, or Montana, or New Jersey, or the Virgin Islands for that matter. I want them looking out for me. And if you're honest, you want the same from your representatives. I didn't vote for my reps so they would further the agenda of New York City. I voted for them so they will further the agenda of Mooresville, Indiana.
Don't misunderstand: I'm not at all saying you shouldn't vote. In fact, I don't think enough people vote. I certainly don't think enough informed people vote -- or maybe I should say too many uninformed people vote. In either case, I think its extremely important to vote for representative you believe values the same ideals and standards as yourself. And hope and pray others do the same.
There's a lot broken in Congress. I believe that. And I believe if they don't have a collective change of heart soon then there's going to be hell to pay -- literally. But while I don't have the power to kick 'em all out and start over, I can hope and pray that enough people value the same things I do -- God, family, small government, wise budgeting and spending, personal responsibility, and a strong military and sense of freedom -- and will vote those values when they have the chance. By doing so, perhaps they will tip the majority in that direction. With congress so evenly divided, it is during these times when we truly see how important it is to have even just one right person voting in our favor.
And remember this when you do vote: both sides feel the same way.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Christmas Songs
With Christmas just around the corner, the local radio stations have begun playing Christmas music, some even making it their 24-hour playlist during the season. I like Christmas music.
Because I've had so many ask (OK, that's a lie. I haven't had anybody ask) I've decided to provide you, the happy reader, with some guidance, and list what I believe to be the best renditions of popular Christmas songs. As there exist multiple renditions of most Christmas songs out there, I often hear inferior renditions of my favorites, and so I thought I'd make a list of what I believe are the best renditions of the most popular songs. It's just my opinion, of course, and I encourage you to submit your own ideas or engage in happy discourse as you disagree with my recommendations, but remember... I'm usually right.
I'll list the artist, and an album it can be found on, if I can.
So, here goes....
I know there's some I've missed, but you can find your own. However, there are a few other great Christmas songs that don't get remade because the original either belongs to the artist, or its just too good to be remade. But they are must-hears at Christmastime. Here's a few...
As for Christmas albums, there was a series put out several years ago called A Very Special Christmas. There's four or five volumes but the first two are OUTSTANDING. Not a bad song on them, with great renditions by great artists, many of whom I've listed here. By contrast, the subsequent volumes are equally as bad as the first two are good. Not sure what happened. But you can find them usually at Wal-Mart.
However, my favorite all-time Christmas album is... wait for it.... Christmas Wishes from Kenny Rogers. This is a fabulous album with a perfect mix of originals and standards. The remakes are very good, not overdone and not ruining the integrity of the originals. Kenny doesn't try to stamp any of them. Just delivers nice, easy performances. His O Holy Night is very good, and the originals Kids and Kentucky Homemade Christmas are not cheesy at all as one might think. I'm a casual Kenny fan, but I promise you'll regret any preconceived notions you have about this. It's that good. Here's the obligatory Gospel cut from the album. You'll hear what I mean.
Thanks for reading. Happy listening and Merry Christmas.
Because I've had so many ask (OK, that's a lie. I haven't had anybody ask) I've decided to provide you, the happy reader, with some guidance, and list what I believe to be the best renditions of popular Christmas songs. As there exist multiple renditions of most Christmas songs out there, I often hear inferior renditions of my favorites, and so I thought I'd make a list of what I believe are the best renditions of the most popular songs. It's just my opinion, of course, and I encourage you to submit your own ideas or engage in happy discourse as you disagree with my recommendations, but remember... I'm usually right.
I'll list the artist, and an album it can be found on, if I can.
So, here goes....
- I'll Be Home for Christmas - Bryan White / Dreaming of Christmas (Many great renditions, but this one is really smooth.)
- O Holy Night - David Phelps, Gaither Vocal Band (I don't have an album, but here's the YouTube link. I defy you to listen to it and not be amazed and moved.)
- I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus - John Mellencamp / A Very Special Christmas (Maybe the most fun Christmas song I know. It's got a great vibe to it.)
- Jingle Bell Rock - Randy Travis / A Very Special Christmas 2 (All deference to the original artist, local guy Bobby Helms. My Dad played music with him. But this one has the best groove. Wait for the restart at the end that totally kicks up the fun a notch.)
- Silent Night/Let It Snow - Boyz II Men / Christmas Interpretations (Turn the bass on your stereo up. When the full group kicks on on Silent Night, it' breathtaking and it'll rattle your windows. Let It Snow has a nice dance music feel to it.)
- Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer - Gene Autry (Can't get better than the original.)
- The Christsmas Song (Chestnuts Roasting...) - Luther Vandross / A Very Special Christmas 2 (Props to the Nat King Cole original. A very smooth listen, indeed, but it's hard to beat Luther on just about anything. This one's different from every other version out there and yet somehow doesn't ruin it.)
- Santa Claus is Coming to Town - A tie between Bruce Springsteen and the Pointer Sisters. (Both versions are fun and offer their own bits that make you chuckle. The Santa laugh at the end of the Springsteen version, accompanied by The Boss' own laughter may give this one a slight edge. There's also a very interesting duet rendition by Cyndi Lauper and Frank Sinatra that one would think would be awful, but is really pretty good. Additionally, there's a very good Neil Diamond version of this song that my wife hates. Go figure.)
- Sleigh Ride - Debbie Gibson / A Very Special Christmas 2 (Just more fun than all the others I've heard. Plus I saw Debbie live in concert in 1989, so there's that.)
- Do You Hear What I Hear - Whitney Houston / A Very Special Christmas (Whitney... 'Nuff said. But I have to give props to my friend, Becca Ford. She hit a home run with it that would make even Whitney proud. If she wasn't dead. Whitney, that is, not Becca.)
- Little Drummer Boy - Bob Seger / A Very Special Christmas (The Silver Bullet Band doesn't over do it)
- My Favorite Things - Kenny Rogers / Christmas Wishes from Kenny Rogers (Sorry to all you Julie Andrews fans. This really isn't a Christmas song, but has come to be associated with the Holiday season over the years. Kenny's version is smooth, snappy and enhances the original by not ruining its integrity.)
- Grown Up Christmas List - Natalie Cole / Christmas Classics (Full of emotion. Seems more heartfelt than the others I've heard.)
- Silver Bells - Bing Crosby (Hard to beat the Bingle!)
- White Christmas - Bryan White / Dreaming of Christmas (This one beats the Bingle. Nice feel.)
- The First Noel - Trans-Siberian Orchestra / Christmas Eve and Other Stories (First of all, if you haven't seen TSO live, YOU MUST GO! If you like live music, this is the best. GREAT Christmas show. If you know the lyrics to the song, then this instrumental is outstanding. If you don't know the lyrics, its still great!)
- Frosty the Snowman - Cindy Brady / A Very Brady Christmas (I know her real name is Susan Olsen, but who cares. Unless you're a Brady fan, this album is pretty awful, and really, it's pretty awful anyway, but Cindy singing this song in her precious lisp is absolutely perfect for the song.)
- Rockin' Around the Christmas Tree - Brenda Lee (The original is just so good. But Darlene Love and Ronnie Spector do some great renditions you can find on YouTube from the David Letterman Show.)
- Mele Kalikimaka - Bing Crosby (The Bingle again, although Jimmy Buffet does a really good remake. If you're wondering what this song is, recall the scene from Christmas Vacation where Clark is imagining his new pool.)
- 12 Days of Christmas - Straight No Chaser (Props to IU fans. Hands down the best. Look it up on YouTube. You will laugh and be amazed at the talent.)
- Baby It's Cold Outside - Vanessa Williams (Playful, although Dean Martin's take is really good. By contrast, Dean Martin's Rudolph is horrible.)
- Jingle Bells - Any version that doesn't have Frank Sinatra's name on it. But can you beat the Barking Dogs version? I doubt it.
- Mary Did You Know - Wynonna Judd and Kenny Rogers (Once again, this is just outstanding for being so unconventional, but there is a Gaither Vocal Band versions that'll shake you up.)
- Blue Christmas - Porky Pig (This really should be Elvis, of course, but this amateur take of Porky Pig singing the song is quite possibly the funniest thing I've ever heard. The kazoo solo and the guy laughing in the background is side-splitting. Look it up on YouTube.)
I know there's some I've missed, but you can find your own. However, there are a few other great Christmas songs that don't get remade because the original either belongs to the artist, or its just too good to be remade. But they are must-hears at Christmastime. Here's a few...
- Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer - Elmo & Patsy
- Wonderful Christmastime - Paul McCartney
- You Make It Feel Like Christmas - Neil Diamond
- Little Saint Nick - Beach Boys
- Fat Like Santa - Dale Jarvis (You've never heard of it. It's from the Bob & Tom album, It's a Wonderful Laugh. Find it on the Bob & Tom website. Outstanding and funny.)
- This is Christmas (War is Over) - John Lennon
- Anything by the Trans-Siberian Orchestra
- You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch
- The Chipmunk Song - The Chipmunks
- Merry Christmas, Baby - Bruce Springsteen
- Silver and Gold - Burl Ives (If I don't include this song, I get left on the Island of Misfits.)
As for Christmas albums, there was a series put out several years ago called A Very Special Christmas. There's four or five volumes but the first two are OUTSTANDING. Not a bad song on them, with great renditions by great artists, many of whom I've listed here. By contrast, the subsequent volumes are equally as bad as the first two are good. Not sure what happened. But you can find them usually at Wal-Mart.
However, my favorite all-time Christmas album is... wait for it.... Christmas Wishes from Kenny Rogers. This is a fabulous album with a perfect mix of originals and standards. The remakes are very good, not overdone and not ruining the integrity of the originals. Kenny doesn't try to stamp any of them. Just delivers nice, easy performances. His O Holy Night is very good, and the originals Kids and Kentucky Homemade Christmas are not cheesy at all as one might think. I'm a casual Kenny fan, but I promise you'll regret any preconceived notions you have about this. It's that good. Here's the obligatory Gospel cut from the album. You'll hear what I mean.
Thanks for reading. Happy listening and Merry Christmas.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)